Grand Oak Canyon (523862)
FairStock Score: 12/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹16.49 |
| Market Cap | ₹855.64 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 332.56 |
| ROCE | -0.22% |
| ROE | 1.79% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 117.65% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹24.31 — ₹66.29 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹0.09 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me start with what I can understand. An NBFC should earn by deploying capital in lending or finance activities. This company shows latest quarter sales of ₹0 Cr and net profit of ₹0 Cr. I cannot value a non-earning enterprise on reported profit growth of 117.65% when the absolute base is meaningless. The market cap is ₹856 Cr, but book value per share is just ₹0.09. That means I am being asked to pay 183 times book for assets that generate a 1.79% ROE and a negative 0.22% ROCE. That fails every Graham test of earning power and financial health. The P/E of 332.56 is not a multiple of real earnings; it is a multiple of negligible earnings. Sales growth is 0%, there is no dividend, debt/equity is unavailable, and promoter holding is unavailable. In investing, missing information is not the same as good information. The stock has fallen from ₹66.29 to ₹16.49, but a falling price does not create value. Graham said price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here, I cannot find value with any confidence. A Piotroski F-score of 5/9 is mediocre, and the FairStock Score of 12/100 is rightly labelled RISKY. This looks like a speculative vehicle, not a compounding business. I would need to see actual revenues, sustainable positive profits, growing tangible book value, and clearer governance. Until then, the margin of safety is absent. I pass.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer