Sayaji Hotels (523710)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹397
Market Cap₹706.26 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE5.91%
ROE5.66%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-59.09%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth3.29%
52-Week Range₹250 — ₹397
SectorLeisure Services
Book Value₹28.41

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let's call this what it is: speculation dressed up as investment. Sayaji Hotels sells at ₹397 while book value is only ₹28.41 — that is 13.97 times book. For a hotel business, that valuation demands exceptional economics. Instead, I see return on equity of 5.66% and return on capital employed of 5.91%, barely above a fixed deposit and far below what a shareholder should earn for taking cyclical risk. The P/E is 0.00, and profit growth has collapsed by 59.09%. The latest quarter is profitable at ₹3 Cr on sales of ₹44 Cr, but annualise that and the market cap of ₹706 Cr is roughly 59 times earnings. Sales growth is just 3.29%, so there is no growth story to justify that multiple. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 and FairStock Score of 0/100 reinforce the picture of weak financial health. There is no dividend yield to compensate you for waiting. A hotel business has high fixed costs, cyclical demand, and little pricing power. A wonderful price cannot turn a mediocre hotel into a wonderful investment; here, the price is far from wonderful. Buying at the top of the 52-week range, with deteriorating earnings, zero dividend, and an undisclosed promoter holding, is not value investing. Benjamin Graham taught me to use the current price to know the market's mood, but to base decisions on intrinsic value. The intrinsic value of a 5.66% ROE business with falling profits is nowhere near ₹397. I will pass. If the company ever delivers higher sustained returns on capital and the price falls to a discount to book value, I will look again. Until then, this belongs in the 'too hard' pile.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer