Flex Foods (523672)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹126 |
| Market Cap | ₹156.87 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -6.18% |
| ROE | -62.75% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% |
| Profit Growth | -2.61% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 63.49% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹29.36 — ₹126 |
| Sector | Agricultural Food & other Products |
| Book Value | ₹46.47 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 63.49% indicates recent revenue acceleration.
- Latest quarterly sales of ₹46 Cr provide a meaningful revenue base.
- Book value is positive at ₹46.47 per share.
- Dividend yield of 1.14% shows some cash return despite losses.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net loss of ₹8 Cr and P/E of 0.00 reflect negative earnings.
- ROE of -62.75% and ROCE of -6.18% show severe capital destruction.
- P/B of 2.71 is expensive for a loss-making commodity agricultural business.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and missing debt/equity and promoter data signal weak financial health and transparency.
AI Analysis
Flex Foods is the kind of stock I would not own. At ₹126, the market capitalisation is ₹157 Cr, but the company just lost ₹8 Cr on ₹46 Cr of quarterly sales. That means the latest quarter was deeply unprofitable. The trailing ROE of -62.75% and ROCE of -6.18% tell me capital is being destroyed, not compounded. A P/B of 2.71 means the market is paying 2.7 times book for a business earning negative returns on that book. Graham would ask: why pay a premium for assets that cannot generate profits? The 63.49% sales growth is a bright number, but profit growth is -2.61%, and the Piotroski F-Score is only 3/9, signalling weak financial health. Debt/equity is not available, and promoter holding is also unavailable; that is not enough data on which to build confidence. A 1.14% dividend yield while the company reports losses is a red flag—dividends should come from surplus earnings, not hope. The 52-week range of ₹29.36 to ₹126.00 shows this stock has already had a spectacular run. Mr. Market is pricing in a turnaround, not waiting for evidence of one. In agricultural products, there is little pricing power or moat. A business that grows sales by losing more money is worse than one that grows slowly with positive margins. I need to see sustainable quarterly profits, positive operating cash flow, and a clear path to higher ROCE before I would consider it a value candidate. At this price, the margin of safety is absent. I would pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer