Yash Innoventure (523650)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests the company is not in severe financial distress based on historical balance-sheet and profitability screens.
• Book value per share is ₹8.02, providing some tangible asset backing even though the market price is above it.
• Latest quarter net loss is only ₹-0 crore, implying minimal cash burn despite zero sales.
• The small market cap of ₹15 crore leaves room for a potential operational revival to move the needle, if management ever delivers one.

Concerns

• Sales are ₹0 crore and net profit is ₹-0 crore, so there is no real earnings stream for a P/E of 0.00 to make sense of.
• ROCE of -7.58% shows capital employed is destroying value, not earning a return.
• Current price of ₹22.68 is below the stated 52-week range of ₹30.50-₹61.67, indicating severe price deterioration and negative market sentiment.
• Promoter holding is not disclosed, and P/B of 2.83 means paying a 2.83 times premium to book value for a business with no revenue or dividend.

AI Analysis

At ₹22.68, Yash Innoventure has a market capitalization of only ₹15 crore. That sounds tiny enough to be interesting, but the fundamentals are hollow. Latest quarter sales are ₹0 crore and net profit is ₹-0 crore. A P/E of 0.00 is not an invitation; it is the market telling me there is no earnings power to price. The reported ROE of 11.80% cannot be trusted as a measure of ongoing business quality when revenue is zero. ROCE of -7.58% is far more honest: the capital employed in this enterprise is earning a negative return. Book value is ₹8.02 per share, so at ₹22.68 I would be paying 2.83 times book for a company that is not generating a rupee of sales. The 52-week range tells a sad story—the stock has fallen from ₹61.67 to ₹22.68, below the previous reported low of ₹30.50. There is no dividend, no sales growth, no profit growth, and promoter holding is not disclosed. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 is the only compensating point, but it is a historical balance-sheet check, not evidence of durable competitive advantage. I cannot identify a moat in a business with no operations. Graham would call this a speculation, not an investment. For a retail investor, the lack of transparency and lack of earning power are disqualifying. Any investment here would be a bet on a future turnaround that management has not yet demonstrated. I would rather watch from the sidelines until audited financials show real revenue and a credible path to profitability. Price is what you pay; with no earnings, value is unknowable.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer