Krypton Industri (523550)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 1/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹51.21 |
| Market Cap | ₹75.26 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 52.52 |
| ROCE | 8.36% |
| ROE | 6.54% |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% |
| Profit Growth | 554.55% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 15.5% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹26.5 — ₹52 |
| Sector | Diversified |
| Book Value | ₹21.27 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
At ₹51.21, Krypton Industri is a small, diversified business with a market cap of only ₹75 Cr. The first thing I notice is the gap between price and underlying profitability. Trailing earnings imply a P/E of 52.52, which is rich for any company, let alone one with an ROE of just 6.54% and ROCE of 8.36%. As Graham would ask: are we paying a high price for mediocre returns on capital? The P/B of 2.41 reinforces that concern. However, the latest quarter shows ₹1 Cr net profit on ₹13 Cr sales, and reported profit growth of 554.55% cannot be ignored. This looks less like a moat-based compounder and more like a turnaround where a low base distorts the growth rate. Sales grew 15.50%, which is respectable, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests improving fundamentals. The dividend yield of 2.72% provides a modest cushion, and the PEG of 0.18 hints that the market may be underpricing earnings if this recovery persists. But I will not let one quarter seduce me. A single ₹1 Cr profit quarter would, if annualized, make the valuation far more reasonable, yet I still need proof of durability. The absence of promoter holding and debt/equity data makes me uncomfortable. I want predictable earning power, strong returns on capital, and honest disclosure. Krypton may yet become a good business, but at this price I would demand a clear margin of safety before acting.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer