Triton Corp. (523387)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹0.54 |
| Market Cap | ₹10.79 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 25.88 |
| ROCE | 9.11% |
| ROE | 9.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 340% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹0.61 — ₹3.47 |
| Sector | Consumer Durables |
| Book Value | ₹0.46 |
Strengths
- Piotroski F-score of 6/9 suggests acceptable basic accounting and operational health
- Price-to-book of 1.17 with book value ₹0.46 provides some asset backing near the current price
- Reported 340% profit growth shows recent earnings improvement, though from a low base
- Latest quarter sales of ₹7 Cr exceed the entire market cap of ₹11 Cr, indicating the business has some operating scale
Concerns
- Sales growth is 0.00% and latest quarterly net profit is ₹0 Cr, so earnings quality is weak
- P/E of 25.88 with zero dividend offers no income or valuation cushion
- Stock trades below its 52-week low of ₹0.61, showing severe market disappointment
- Promoter holding is not disclosed, raising transparency concerns
AI Analysis
At 54 paise with a market cap of just ₹11 crore, Triton Corp. looks like a penny stock, and penny stocks rarely fit my circle of competence. Gems and jewellery is a tough, commodity-like business: no pricing power, cyclical demand, and competition from unorganized players. That fails my first test of a great business — a durable moat. The financials reinforce caution. Sales growth is flat at 0.00%, and the latest quarter shows ₹7 crore of revenue but zero net profit. A reported 340% profit growth sounds exciting, but with no sales growth and a tiny base, it is the kind of number Graham would call raw material for hope, not arithmetic of value. At ₹0.54, the stock trades below its 52-week low of ₹0.61 and far off its high of ₹3.47, telling me the market is not rewarding this company. The P/E of 25.88 is expensive for a business whose quarterly profit is zero. Book value of ₹0.46 and P/B of 1.17 mean I am paying only slightly above net worth; that is good, but not a margin of safety. ROE and ROCE are both around 9–9.6%, mediocre. The Piotroski score of 6/9 suggests the financial health is not broken, but I cannot build a thesis on that alone. No dividend, and promoter holding is not disclosed — always a red flag. A PEG of 0.08 is misleading when sales are stagnant. This could be a turnaround if real operations revive, but I need evidence of consistent, growing cash earnings. Until then, this is a speculative lottery ticket, not an investment.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer