TMT (I) (522171)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates some positive signals relative to a weak financial profile.
• Reported profit growth of 42.86% shows improvement from a very low base.
• Positive ROE of 5.88% is less bad than the deeply negative ROCE, suggesting the equity base is not being fully eroded.
• Tiny market cap of ₹3 Cr could offer outsized gains if genuine restructuring or a new business is announced.

Concerns

• Latest quarter sales are ₹0 Cr and net profit is ₹-0 Cr, so there is no real operating activity.
• ROCE at -107.32% indicates capital is being destroyed at the operating level.
• Book value, debt/equity, promoter holding, and dividend data are all unavailable, making a Graham-style safety check impossible.
• Zero sales growth and a quote outside the stated 52-week range suggest poor liquidity and unreliable trading data.

AI Analysis

Looking at TMT (I), I am reminded that a low share price is not the same as a bargain. This is a ₹3 crore market-cap company with no operating engine: sales in the latest quarter are ₹0 Cr and net profit is ₹-0 Cr. Sales growth is 0.00%, so the topline is static. The 42.86% profit-growth number is mathematically positive but economically meaningless from a near-zero base. ROCE of -107.32% is the loudest warning here—it says the company is destroying every rupee of capital employed. ROE of 5.88% is positive, but with zero sales I cannot reconcile it with a deeply negative ROCE. A Graham investor must be able to see assets and liabilities; here book value is N/A, debt/equity is N/A, and promoter holding is N/A. The Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 is the only point of mild comfort, but a score of 5 is not a moat and does not cure an empty order book. There is no dividend, and at ₹3.93 the stock trades outside the reported 52-week range of ₹5.75-₹7.67, which tells me the tape is thin and possibly unreliable. I cannot calculate a meaningful P/E because earnings are not present. Without a visible path to revenue, positive cash flow, and honest disclosure, buying this would be speculation, not investment. At best it is a placeholder; at worst it is a value trap. For a retail investor, hope is not a strategy. Graham taught me to value what I can verify and to demand a margin of safety. TMT (I) offers neither. I would rather miss the upside than lose capital in a business that cannot prove it exists operationally. I pass.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer