United Van Der (522091)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹122.6 |
| Market Cap | ₹169.07 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 45.97 |
| ROCE | 11.64% |
| ROE | 11.42% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% |
| Profit Growth | -38.81% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 9.55% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹28.1 — ₹122.6 |
| Sector | Electrical Equipment |
| Book Value | ₹40.14 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me apply simple tests before investing. United Van Der has a market cap of ₹169 Cr and trades at ₹122.60, near the top of its 52-week range of ₹27.22 to ₹122.60. That price movement excites people, but it doesn't reassure me. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹8 Cr and net profit of just ₹1 Cr. Over a year, profit has fallen by 38.81%, yet I am asked to pay 45.97 times earnings and 3.05 times book value. That equation makes no sense for a value investor. The company earns an ROE of 11.42% and ROCE of 11.64%—acceptable, but not the durable high returns I look for in a great franchise. Sales growth of 9.55% is positive but modest, and with a small absolute scale, one bad quarter can swing the picture. The Piotroski score of 4 out of 9 is a warning flag; it tells me the financial health is weak, not strong. Dividend yield of 1.03% offers little income support. I cannot even assess the debt-equity position because it is not available. Heavy electrical equipment is inherently cyclical, and this looks like a cyclical business at an ebullient price. If earnings have already declined, the high P/E and PEG of 4.81 mean I am paying for future perfection. Graham would say price is what you pay, value is what you get. At ₹122.60, I see more risk than reward. I'd keep it on my watchlist, but only consider buying at a price that gives a real margin of safety.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer