Batliboi (522004)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹120.95 |
| Market Cap | ₹414.98 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 35.68 |
| ROCE | 8.27% |
| ROE | -2.02% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.68% |
| Profit Growth | 705.88% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 30.12% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹66.41 — ₹157 |
| Sector | Industrial Manufacturing |
| Book Value | ₹41.96 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 30.12% shows strong revenue momentum
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates broad fundamental improvement
- ROCE of 8.27% is positive despite weak ROE
- PEG of 0.10 looks optically cheap, reflecting high growth rates
Concerns
- Latest quarter net loss of ₹2 Cr on ₹124 Cr sales shows weak profitability
- ROE is negative at -2.02%, destroying shareholder value
- P/E of 35.68 is expensive for a company with recent losses
- Profit growth of 705.88% is from a low base and not reliable evidence of quality
AI Analysis
Let me start with what I don't like. This is an industrial products company with a trailing P/E of 35.68 and a market cap of ₹415 Cr, yet the latest quarter showed a net loss of ₹2 Cr on sales of ₹124 Cr. ROE is negative at -2.02%. I cannot call that a high-quality business. The 705.88% profit growth and PEG of 0.10 look impressive at first glance, but such growth from a low base is meaningless when the most recent quarter is in loss. A Graham investor would ask: where is the margin of safety? At ₹120.95, the stock trades at 2.88 times book value of ₹41.96. That is not cheap for a company earning a negative return on equity. Now, there are some positives. Sales grew 30.12%, so there is traction in demand. ROCE is positive at 8.27%, and the Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 suggests some fundamental improvements. The stock is also ₹36 below its 52-week high of ₹157, though not deeply discounted. But my rule is to avoid buying a business unless I understand its economics and see durable earnings power. Here, the latest quarter erodes confidence. The loss of ₹2 Cr on ₹124 Cr revenue is thin. Is this cyclical pressure or operational trouble? I don't have promoter holding or debt data. Without those, I am flying blind. A dividend yield of 0.68% offers little comfort. I would place this in the turnaround camp, not a growth stalwart. It may become attractive if it can show consistent quarterly profits, positive ROE, and a clearer moat. Until then, I watch and wait. Price without quality is risk, not opportunity.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer