Tai Industries (519483)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹42.5 |
| Market Cap | ₹25.7 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 450 |
| ROCE | 6% |
| ROE | 0.14% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -196.77% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -39.64% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹20.7 — ₹42.5 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹50 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Let me start with the obvious: at ₹42.50, Tai Industries sells below book value of ₹50, a P/B of 0.85. That is the only thing that brings me to the table. In Graham's language, buying at a discount to book gives a margin of safety, but only if the book is honest. With a Piotroski F-score of 3/9, I cannot trust the balance-sheet signals. The company is a trader and distributor; businesses like this rarely possess moats. The numbers confirm the struggle: sales growth has collapsed by 39.64%, profit growth has fallen by 196.77%, and ROE is a negligible 0.14%. The trailing P/E of 450 is meaningless when earnings are almost zero; the latest quarter still shows net profit rounded to -₹0 Cr on sales of ₹40 Cr, so the engine is not generating acceptable shareholder returns. ROCE of 6% is thin, and with no dividend, the minority shareholder gets no cash while waiting. I also notice debt/equity is not available, so I cannot evaluate leverage. The market cap is just ₹26 Cr, so this is a microcap; institutional scrutiny will be low. Am I being offered a dollar for 85 cents? Maybe, but a poor business at a low price is still a poor investment unless assets are realized or earnings recover. Graham would demand evidence: real net current assets, no hidden liabilities, and a credible path to profitability. I see none of that yet. For now, this is an asset play, not a compounding machine. I would wait for proof.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer