Kisaan Parivar (519230)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹25.3 |
| Market Cap | ₹22.71 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 7.84 |
| ROCE | 42.98% |
| ROE | 16.69% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -111.32% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -100% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹12.52 — ₹27 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹6.15 |
Strengths
- Historical ROCE of 42.98% indicates past efficiency in using capital
- ROE of 16.69% is respectable on a trailing basis
- Book value of ₹6.15 per share provides some tangible asset backing
- Small market cap of ₹23 Cr could attract special-situation interest if business revives
Concerns
- Latest quarter sales and net profit are ₹0 Cr – operations appear halted
- Sales growth of -100% and profit growth of -111.32% show severe deterioration
- P/B of 4.11 against book value ₹6.15 means paying a large premium for a non-earning asset
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health, and dividend yield is 0%
AI Analysis
Friends, when I look at Kisaan Parivar, I follow the same rule I learned from Ben Graham: investing is most intelligent when it is most businesslike. This is a company with a market cap of just ₹23 Cr, but the latest quarter shows sales of ₹0 Cr and net profit of ₹0 Cr. A business with no revenue cannot be valued on earnings; the P/E of 7.84 is meaningless if the trailing profit comes from stale periods. Sales growth of -100% and profit growth of -111.32% tell me the business has effectively stopped. I do not like paying ₹25.30 for shares with a book value of ₹6.15 – that is a P/B of 4.11 for a non-earning asset. The ROCE of 42.98% and ROE of 16.69% may look attractive, but those are backward-looking and unreliable when turnover has collapsed to zero. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 confirms weak financial health. With no dividend yield and no promoter holding details, I have no signal that insiders are aligned with shareholders. I cannot classify this as a great business; it has no moat, no growth, and no visible earnings power. It might be a shell or a stalled trading business awaiting some new activity. In Graham's language, this is not a margin of safety – it is a margin of folly. If the company can restart operations and show meaningful sales, perhaps it becomes a turnaround candidate, but I need evidence, not hope. Until then, I pass. My circle of competence tells me that a zero-revenue company with a P/B above 4 is speculation, not investment.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer