Intl. Data Mgt. (517044)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Positive, though minimal, ROE of 3.07% suggests the equity base is not entirely loss-making.
• Latest quarter net loss is effectively breakeven at ₹-0 Cr, not a severe cash burn.
• Price of ₹26.91 is only about 15% above the 52-week low of ₹23.35, so the stock is trading near its recent floor.
• Small market cap of ₹6 Cr means even a small absolute improvement could have a noticeable effect on the business.

Concerns

• Zero sales and zero net profit leave no earnings stream to value.
• ROCE of -200% indicates severe capital inefficiency or capital destruction.
• Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 points to weak financial health and poor operating quality.
• Missing book value, debt-to-equity, and promoter holding figures make proper fundamental analysis impossible.

AI Analysis

I begin with the same test Graham taught me: what is a business worth, and what am I paying? Here the market says ₹6 crore for Intl. Data Mgt. But the income statement says ₹0 crore in sales and effectively ₹0 crore net profit. There is no earnings engine to put a multiple on. A P/E of 0.00 is not cheap valuation; it is the absence of earnings. ROCE of -200% tells me the capital in this business is generating negative returns, which is value destruction, not creation. ROE of 3.07% is barely a flicker and could vanish with one bad quarter. Sales and profit growth at 0.00% are meaningless because the base is zero. The Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 reinforces my caution; a score that low is usually a sign of deteriorating financials or poor accounting quality. I have no book value, no debt-to-equity ratio, and no promoter holding figure. Without these, I cannot compute a margin of safety. The stock trades at ₹26.91, down from the 52-week high of ₹40.67 and closer to the low of ₹23.35, but a falling share price is not a bargain. In Benjamin Graham's language, this is not an investment operation with protection of principal and adequate return; it is speculation. The company may have a consulting label, but with no revenue and no disclosed assets, there is no durable competitive advantage, no pricing power, and no trustworthy management to assess. I would need years of consistent earnings, a strong balance sheet, and honest disclosures before I could even put this on my watchlist. Until then, the rational move is to pass. There is no margin of safety in a business I cannot understand or value.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer