Sh. Karthik Pap. (516106)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹10.11 |
| Market Cap | ₹19.52 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 3.65% |
| ROE | -10.82% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 2.92% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹5.04 — ₹10.11 |
| Sector | Paper, Forest & Jute Products |
| Book Value | ₹1.66 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Looking at Sh. Karthik Pap, I see a business that fails my first test: it does not generate dependable earnings. The P/E is effectively zero because there is no profit to speak of, and the latest quarter shows net profit of ₹-0 Cr on sales of ₹14 Cr. That is not an earnings machine; that is a cyclical paper business struggling to stay above water. Sales growth of 2.92% is meagre and certainly not evidence of pricing power or a moat. A moat should show up in returns on capital; here ROE is -10.82% and ROCE is only 3.65%. For a microcap priced at ₹10.11, the market cap is ₹20 Cr, yet book value is just ₹1.66 per share. I am being asked to pay 6.09 times net assets for a business that earns negative returns on those assets. Graham would insist on a margin of safety; with P/B over 6 and no dividend yield, there is no margin of safety. The Piotroski F-score of 4/9 reinforces my caution. Promoter holding is not even available, so I cannot judge management alignment. The fact the stock trades near its 52-week high of ₹10.65 seems speculative, not fundamental. In a commodity paper business, I would consider buying at times of depressed earnings if the balance sheet were strong and the price low. That is not this case. This is a cyclical commodity business, and without earnings, a reasonable valuation is impossible. I will stay away until there is evidence of sustained profitability and better disclosure.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer