Duroply Indust. (516003)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹275
Market Cap₹271.23 Cr
P/E Ratio20.98
ROCE7.23%
ROE6.25%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth17.21%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth3.61%
52-Week Range₹120.6 — ₹275
SectorConsumer Durables
Book Value₹126.17

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Duroply Indust. is a classic case of price running ahead of business fundamentals. Over the past year, the stock has travelled from ₹120.60 to ₹275.00 — the top of its 52-week range. Yet when I look underneath, I see a plywood business earning a return on equity of just 6.25% and a return on capital employed of 7.23%. Those are mediocre numbers for any industry, and they tell me this is not a franchise with pricing power. A true moat shows up as consistently high returns on capital; here, the moat looks shallow. Sales growth of 3.61% is slow, and the latest quarter's net profit of ₹1 Cr against sales of ₹93 Cr is razor-thin. Whatever the seasonality, that kind of margin is fragile. Yes, profit grew 17.21%, but from a low base. The stated PEG ratio of 2.02 confirms the market is paying up for growth that is more hope than history. On the positive side, the Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 is respectable. It suggests that the company's financial health is not deteriorating; there are signs of fundamental improvement. Book value is ₹126.17 per share, so at ₹275 I am paying 2.18 times book. For a business with 6% ROE, that offers no margin of safety. The P/E of 20.98 is a demanding multiple for a slow-growing, cyclical manufacturer. There is no dividend, so my return depends entirely on price appreciation and capital gains. Graham would insist on a margin of safety; Buffett would demand a wonderful business. Duroply is, at best, a mediocre business at a full price. I would wait for a better price or evidence of materially improved capital returns before acting.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer