Garware Synth (514400)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹20.34 |
| Market Cap | ₹12.06 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 28.32 |
| ROCE | -3.05% |
| ROE | -23.5% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 320% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -2.35% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹11.81 — ₹30.42 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
Strengths
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 is moderate, suggesting not every financial metric is deteriorating.
- Reported 320% profit growth indicates some earnings improvement from a low or negative base, even if unproven.
- Tiny ₹12 Cr market cap means a genuine recovery could move the needle significantly.
- Latest quarter sales of ₹2 Cr provide a minimal operating base to work from.
Concerns
- ROE of -23.50% and ROCE of -3.05% clearly show capital destruction.
- Sales growth is -2.35%, and latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr, so real earnings power is absent.
- P/E of 28.32 is misleading and expensive against near-zero earnings; PEG 0.09 relies on unsustainable, low-base profit growth.
- Missing book value, debt/equity, and promoter holding data make balance-sheet risk impossible to assess.
AI Analysis
Looking at Garware Synth, I struggle to find a reason to get excited. The market cap is ₹12 Cr, and the latest quarter shows sales of just ₹2 Cr with net profit of ₹0 Cr. That tells me the P/E of 28.32 is an accounting artifact, not a reflection of real earnings power. A 320% profit growth number sounds impressive until you realize that a tiny or negative base can make any percentage meaningless. The underlying economics are poor: ROE is -23.50% and ROCE is -3.05%. In plain words, the company is destroying shareholder capital, and a trading/distributors business rarely has the pricing power or durable moat I demand. Sales growth is -2.35%, so there is no top-line momentum either. With no dividend and a Piotroski score of just 5/9, this is far from a quality compounder. I also notice critical missing information: no book value, no debt/equity, no promoter holding. I cannot value a company when I cannot see its balance sheet or who controls it. Graham taught me to demand a margin of safety; here, with negative returns, declining sales, and near-zero profits, the safety is absent. The 52-week range of ₹11.81 to ₹30.42 shows volatility, but volatility is not the same as bargain. It might be a speculative turnaround, but the latest quarter's zero net profit does not confirm any recovery. In summary, this is not a business I would understand or own. Small market cap and a low PEG ratio are traps, not advantages, when the E is not real. I will pass.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer