Tulsyan NEC (513629)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹85.94 |
| Market Cap | ₹143.23 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -1.13% |
| ROE | -23.8% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -6.19% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -13.39% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹17.1 — ₹85.94 |
| Sector | Industrial Products |
| Book Value | ₹245.5 |
Strengths
- Reports book value of ₹245.50 per share against price ₹85.94, giving a P/B of 0.35 and a large stated asset cushion.
- Latest quarter revenue of ₹156 Cr shows the business still has a meaningful scale in iron and steel.
- The 52-week range of ₹17.10 to ₹85.94 suggests market sentiment has already turned somewhat bullish on this cyclical.
- At this price, a lot of bad news may already be reflected, since earnings are negative and there is no dividend.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net loss of ₹29 Cr against ₹156 Cr sales shows continuing cash burn; this is large relative to the ₹143 Cr market cap.
- ROE of -23.80% and ROCE of -1.13% indicate value destruction on both shareholder equity and total capital employed.
- Sales growth of -13.39% and a Piotroski F-score of 2/9 point to deteriorating operations and weak financial health.
- P/E of 0.00 reflects negative earnings; the low P/B may be a value trap rather than a margin of safety.
AI Analysis
At first glance, Tulsyan NEC looks like a classic Graham bargain. The price is ₹85.94, while book value is ₹245.50, so I am paying only 35 paise for every rupee of stated net assets. But I never buy a stock simply because it looks cheap on a balance sheet. I must understand the earnings power and the durability of the assets. This is a steel products business, and steel is a commodity with little pricing power and no economic moat. The financial evidence is grim. Return on equity is -23.80%, ROCE is -1.13%, and the latest quarter produced a net loss of ₹29 crore on sales of ₹156 crore. Sales are also shrinking at -13.39%. The company is losing money on both shareholder equity and total capital employed. The stated book value may be real, but it is being eroded every quarter by these losses. The Piotroski F-score of 2 out of 9 reinforces my caution—out of nine fundamental signs of health, almost none are present. There is no dividend, so I cannot even get paid while waiting. Meanwhile, the share price has rallied from ₹17.10 to ₹85.94, but the business fundamentals have not followed. In my experience, a low P/B ratio can be a trap when management is destroying value. This looks like one of those cases. I would prefer a wonderful business at a fair price over a poor business at a low asset price. For Tulsyan NEC, I would need to see clear evidence of a turnaround—stabilized steel prices, better cost discipline, positive earnings, and an improved F-score—before I consider owning it. Until then, I watch and wait.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer