Mardia Samyoung (513544)

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Price of ₹2.27 versus book value of ₹4.10 gives a P/B of 0.55, a classic Graham-style margin of safety if assets are real.
• Latest quarter shows a turnaround spark: ₹12 crore sales and ₹1 crore net profit.
• High reported returns: ROE 36.26% and ROCE 22.59% suggest efficient use of capital, if sustainable.
• Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates improving financial health on multiple fundamental metrics.

Concerns

• P/E of 693.58 contradicts the latest quarterly profit scale, suggesting trailing earnings are tiny and the 1,000% profit growth is off a very low base.
• Current price ₹2.27 versus the 52-week range of ₹40.91-₹123.40 raises serious data integrity or corporate action concerns.
• Zero sales growth and zero dividend offer no confirmation of a durable operating recovery.
• Promoter holding is N/A and debt/equity is N/A, leaving ownership and leverage risks unverified in a ₹2 crore micro-cap.

AI Analysis

When I look at Mardia Samyoung, my first instinct is caution. A copper company with a market capitalization of ₹2 crore, a price of ₹2.27, and a book value of ₹4.10 immediately catches my Graham-trained eye. Buying a rupee of assets for 55 paise can be a bargain, but only if the numbers are trustworthy. Here, the inconsistencies trouble me. The P/E stands at 693.58, yet the latest quarter shows ₹1 crore net profit on ₹12 crore sales. A 1,000% profit growth sounds exciting, but such a leap usually comes from a very low base, which the P/E confirms. The stated 52-week range of ₹40.91 to ₹123.40 while the current price is ₹2.27 suggests either a corporate action, a data error, or a deeply distressed situation. In any case, I cannot rely on valuation alone. The business quality is unclear. Copper is a cyclical commodity; there is no moat, no pricing power, and no dividend to compensate while waiting. ROE at 36.26% and ROCE at 22.59% are impressive on paper, but with sales growth at 0.00%, this is not a growing franchise. The Piotroski score of 6/9 gives some hope that fundamentals are improving, and the PEG of 0.69 tempts us to call it a growth stock, but I refuse to pay a crazy P/E for a tiny, opaque copper player. Graham would demand margin of safety. At a P/B of 0.55, that margin appears present—if the book value is real and the latest profit is recurring. But the data gaps: no promoter holding, no debt-equity ratio, no dividend, and a suspicious price history, force me to treat this as a speculative turnaround, not an investment. I will wait for cleaner numbers, consistently profitable quarters, and proof that copper demand is carrying the company forward.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer