Chrome Silicon (513005)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹45.79 |
| Market Cap | ₹75.07 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -86.58% |
| ROE | -80.71% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 12.7% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -97.6% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹36.72 — ₹57.7 |
| Sector | Ferrous Metals |
| Book Value | ₹62.94 |
Strengths
- Price-to-book of 0.73 provides a margin of safety against the stated book value of ₹62.94 per share.
- Small market cap of ₹75 Cr leaves room for a potential asset realisation or restructuring story.
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, while moderate, is not entirely negative and warrants further monitoring.
- Current price is near the lower half of the 52-week range, suggesting limited speculative froth.
Concerns
- Sales have collapsed by 97.6%; latest quarter revenue is only ₹1 Cr against a net loss of ₹2 Cr.
- ROE at -80.71% and ROCE at -86.58% show severe capital destruction.
- P/E is meaningless due to negative earnings, and dividend yield is zero.
- Promoter holding and debt/equity are N/A, leaving crucial governance and leverage risks undisclosed.
AI Analysis
At ₹45.79, Chrome Silicon is selling at a one-third discount to its stated book value of ₹62.94. Benjamin Graham taught me to seek a margin of safety, and 0.73 price-to-book is attractive on paper. But a business is worth only what it can earn. This company's sales have collapsed by 97.6%; the latest quarter produced just ₹1 crore of revenue and a ₹2 crore net loss. With ROE at -80.71% and ROCE at -86.58%, shareholder equity is being destroyed at an alarming pace. The reported 12.7% profit growth is meaningless when a loss persists. A P/E of 0.00 is not a bargain signal; it simply tells me earnings are zero or negative. I see no moat in ferro alloy manufacturing — commodities do not forgive capital misallocation. The Piotroski score of 5/9 offers no strong evidence of financial quality. Dividend yield is zero, so I receive no income while waiting for a turnaround. If book value can be realised, there may be an asset play here, but with sales at ₹1 crore and continuing losses, the book value is a melting ice cube. I also do not like seeing promoter holding marked N/A; for a small-cap, inside ownership matters. The price is within the 52-week band of ₹36.72 to ₹57.70, so it is neither a panic low nor a high. Overall, this is not a growing operation or a stable stalwart. It is a possible asset play with a real balance-sheet cushion, but I would demand clear evidence that losses are ending and sales are reviving before investing. In Graham's language: the numbers show a cheap asset, but I am not yet getting paid to take the risk.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer