N2N Technologies (512279)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹22.9 |
| Market Cap | ₹7.39 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 6.05 |
| ROCE | -4.04% |
| ROE | -0.96% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹25.31 — ₹42.15 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹17.17 |
Strengths
- P/E of 6.05 is optically inexpensive against reported earnings
- P/B of 1.33 means the price is not far from stated book value of ₹17.17
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some balance-sheet resilience
- Small ₹7 crore market cap offers potential upside if operations ever gain traction
Concerns
- ROE of -0.96% and ROCE of -4.04% show the business is not earning its cost of capital
- Zero sales growth, zero profit growth, and zero dividend mean no compounding and no shareholder return
- Latest quarter sales of ₹1 crore and net profit of ₹0 crore reflect negligible, break-even operations
- Promoter holding is N/A and price is below the 52-week low of ₹24.11, signalling weak confidence and limited transparency
AI Analysis
At ₹22.90, N2N Technologies is a ₹7 crore microcap selling at 6.05 times earnings and 1.33 times book value. A low P/E always catches my eye, but I must ask what those earnings represent. The latest quarter shows sales of just ₹1 crore and net profit of ₹0 crore. Trailing earnings may exist, but the business earns a negative ROE of -0.96% and a negative ROCE of -4.04%. That is not a franchise; that is capital standing still while costs nibble away. There is zero sales growth, zero profit growth, and zero dividend. The reported PEG of 0.07 is mathematically meaningless without growth—it flatters a business that is not compounding. The Piotroski score of 6/9 is decent, but a 6 out of 9 in a business with no earnings power is not enough margin of safety. Book value is ₹17.17, so I am paying ₹22.90 for assets worth ₹17.17 and earnings that are roughly nil. Debt/Equity is not available, and promoter holding is not known—two serious red flags for an outsider. The share price is also below the 52-week low of ₹24.11, telling me the market sees no reason to bid this up. In the Graham framework, cheapness only matters if the assets are productive or if the discount to intrinsic value is wide enough. Here, the discount is thin and productivity is absent. For a retail investor, this is a small, illiquid, no-moat business. I would need a far lower price, or proof that capital can earn attractive returns, before acting. I prefer a wonderful business at a fair price; this is neither.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer