N D Metal Inds. (512024)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹104.5
Market Cap₹26.11 Cr
P/E Ratio111.71
ROCE6.63%
ROE5.42%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth16.67%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-100%
52-Week Range₹75 — ₹104.5
SectorNon - Ferrous Metals
Book Value₹16.83

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At first glance, this is the kind of stock I would put in the 'too hard' pile. N D Metal Inds. trades at ₹104.50 with a market cap of only ₹26 Cr, yet book value is just ₹16.83 per share. That means I am paying over six times net assets for a business whose latest quarter shows ₹0 sales and ₹0 profit. Full-year sales growth is -100%. As Graham said, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here I struggle to identify what value I am getting. A copper company with no copper sales is not a business; it is a story. The reported profit growth of 16.67% sounds nice, but on a tiny base and with zero quarterly sales, it is nearly meaningless. ROE of 5.42% and ROCE of 6.63% are far below what I would need to compensate for the risk. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests the balance sheet is not crumbling, and the absence of reported debt is a small positive. But paying 111.71 times earnings and a PEG of 6.70 leaves no margin of safety. There is no dividend, promoter holding is not disclosed, and FairStock cannot score the company due to insufficient data. This is not a compounding machine; it is a waiting game. If copper operations resume and real sales come back, the small market cap could produce enormous operating leverage. But I do not invest based on hope. I need evidence. Until I see revenue, clear margins, and honest disclosure, this belongs on the watchlist, not in my portfolio. Mr. Market has already marked the stock to its 52-week high; I prefer to buy when there is pessimism, not when the price already prices in a successful turnaround.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer