Scan Steels (511672)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹61.9
Market Cap₹362.75 Cr
P/E Ratio11.01
ROCE6.39%
ROE4%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth10.71%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth9.82%
52-Week Range₹24.4 — ₹61.9
SectorFerrous Metals
Book Value₹71.95

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Scan Steels is the kind of stock that catches my eye, but it is not the kind of business I love. At ₹61.90, the market values the entire company at ₹363 Cr, just 11 times earnings and only 0.86 times book value of ₹71.95. That sounds like a Graham-style margin of safety. However, the book is only worth owning if it earns a fair return. Here, ROE is just 4% and ROCE is 6.39%. This is not a wonderful franchise; it is a plain steel business earning thin money. The latest quarter tells the real story: sales of ₹192 Cr produced net profit of ₹3 Cr, a margin of barely 1.5%. In such a commodity business, a small downturn in steel prices can wipe out profits entirely. The Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 gives me some comfort that the company's financial health has improved recently, and sales growth of 9.82% and profit growth of 10.71% are respectable. With a PEG of 1.07, growth is not being priced absurdly. But I must be careful: in a cyclical sector, today's growth can vanish quickly. I also see zero dividend yield. I am asked to wait for capital gains alone, with no cash payment while I wait. What bothers me most is what I cannot see. Debt/equity and promoter holding are marked N/A, so I cannot assess leverage or owner alignment. In a volatile steel cycle, hidden debt can turn a cheap stock into a value trap. The price sits at its 52-week high of ₹61.90; market enthusiasm has removed some of the bargain cushion. Ben Graham would say the asset value offers some protection, but the weak return on capital demands a wider discount than this. I would keep this on my watchlist, not my buy list.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer