BGIL Films & Tec (511664)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹7.68 |
| Market Cap | ₹8.7 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 0.34% |
| ROE | -0.65% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 120% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹6.51 — ₹24.69 |
| Sector | Entertainment |
| Book Value | ₹17.82 |
Strengths
- Price-to-book ratio of 0.43, paying ₹7.68 for ₹17.82 of stated book value
- Market cap of ₹9 Cr against roughly ₹21 Cr of stated book equity
- Piotroski F-score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial health
- Trading near the lower end of its 52-week range, already repriced sharply from ₹24.69
Concerns
- Latest quarter shows zero sales and zero net profit, so there is no operating earnings engine
- ROE is negative at -0.65%; the business is not generating shareholder returns
- Film library and production assets are notoriously subjective in valuation and may not be worth stated book
- No promoter holding disclosure, no dividend, and debt/equity is N/A, leaving transparency and leverage unclear
AI Analysis
Let's call this what it is: a tiny film-industry enterprise with no current earnings to examine. At ₹7.68, the market capitalisation is about ₹9 Cr while the stated book value is ₹17.82 per share, translating to a stated book value of roughly ₹21 Cr. So I'm being asked to pay less than half a rupee for every rupee of net assets. That is interesting, but only if those assets are worth their carrying amount. Film production, distribution and exhibition assets are not like a factory or cash; their value depends on future hits, distribution contracts and the whims of audiences. Right now the latest quarter shows ₹0 sales and ₹0 profit, and ROE is -0.65%. A company earning negative returns on its assets is not compounding wealth. The reported 120% profit growth is meaningless from a near-zero base. No dividend, no promoter holding figure, and an insufficient data score means an outsider cannot easily trust the balance sheet. On the positive side, the Piotroski F-score of 6 out of 9 is not terrible and suggests some recent financial stability. But this is not a wonderful business with a durable moat. This is a possible asset play, maybe even a net-net, if the film library and other assets could be liquidated close to book. Without control or a clear catalyst, buying it is speculation dressed as value. I prefer businesses that earn rather than merely sit. Keep this one small, if at all.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer