Shristi Infra (511411)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹46.02 |
| Market Cap | ₹105.27 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 1.16% |
| ROE | 6.2% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -824.29% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -8.97% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹23.2 — ₹46.02 |
| Sector | Realty |
Strengths
- Trailing ROE of 6.2% suggests some modest positive return on existing equity.
- Latest quarter sales of ₹17 crore indicate the company still has an operating base.
- Stock is at the top of its 52-week range, showing current market interest.
- Small market cap of ₹105 crore leaves room for operational leverage if execution improves.
Concerns
- Latest quarter net loss of ₹6 crore on revenue of ₹17 crore is a severe margin problem.
- Profit growth of -824% and sales decline of -8.97% show deteriorating fundamentals.
- Piotroski F-score of 3/9 indicates poor financial health and elevated distress risk.
- No dividend, no book value disclosure, no promoter holding data, and no debt/equity data reduce transparency.
AI Analysis
Shristi Infra is exactly the sort of situation I would circle and then walk away from. The market cap is ₹105 crore, but the latest quarter shows sales of ₹17 crore and a net loss of ₹6 crore. Losing a third of quarterly revenue is no business at all. The P/E of 0.00 is not a bargain signal; it is an accounting ghost. Profit growth of -824% means whatever earnings existed before have evaporated. ROCE at just 1.16% cannot justify the risk of owning residential and commercial projects; I could earn more in a fixed deposit without sacrificing sleep. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 confirms weak fundamentals: poor profitability, deteriorating operations, and likely financial strain. Sales growth is -8.97%, so the top line is shrinking while the company still cannot turn a profit. No dividend means patient shareholders get no compensation. Book value is unavailable, which bothers me more than a high P/B would: if I cannot see the asset base, I cannot compute a margin of safety. Graham would say this fails nearly every quantitative test. Buffett would say the moat is invisible. In real estate projects, land, execution, cost control, and balance sheet strength are everything. Here, debt-to-equity is undisclosed, promoter holding is undisclosed, and the F-score is poor. The 52-week range shows the stock has moved from ₹23.20 to ₹46.02, but paying double for a deteriorating business is speculation, not investing. This could become a turnaround one day, but I need evidence: positive cash flow, rising ROCE, transparent accounts. Until then, I will pass. There are better pavements to fish in.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer