Millen. Online (511187)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹2.46 |
| Market Cap | ₹12.68 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -4.61% |
| ROE | -2.71% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹1.29 — ₹2.88 |
| Sector | Commercial Services & Supplies |
| Book Value | ₹0.99 |
Strengths
- Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests some recent fundamental improvements despite weak headline profitability.
- Latest quarter net profit is ₹0 Cr, so the company avoided an outright loss in that period.
- Book value of ₹0.99 per share provides a tangible equity base against the current market price.
- Quarterly sales of ₹1 Cr show the business is operational, not an empty shell.
Concerns
- Negative ROE of -2.71% and ROCE of -4.61% mean capital is being destroyed, not compounded.
- P/B of 2.48 is expensive for a zero-earning business, with no P/E to justify the premium.
- Sales growth and profit growth are both 0.00%, and latest net profit is ₹0 Cr, offering no growth evidence.
- Promoter holding is not disclosed, creating a transparency red flag for a ₹13 Cr microcap.
AI Analysis
At first glance, Millen Online is exactly the kind of micro-cap that demands a slow, careful look. A ₹13 crore market capitalisation, quarterly sales of just ₹1 crore, and a net profit of ₹0 crore mean there is no earnings power to anchor a valuation. The reported P/E of 0.00 is therefore meaningless; Graham would say we are buying into a business, not a symbol. The balance sheet shows book value of ₹0.99 per share, but at ₹2.46 the market is asking 2.48 times book for a company earning -2.71% ROE and -4.61% ROCE. That is not value; that is paying up for capital destruction. I see no durable moat, no pricing power, no growth: sales and profit growth are both 0.00%, and there is no dividend to compensate. The only positive sign is a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, which suggests some recent improvement in financial health. But one decent score does not make a business. With promoter holding not disclosed and FairStock itself flagging insufficient data, this is too close to speculation. The 52-week range of ₹1.29-₹2.88 shows a stock that has bounced, but value investing cannot rely on price momentum. I would wait until Millen proves it can earn a positive return on equity, grow quarterlies beyond ₹1 crore, and provide transparent ownership information. Until then, it belongs in the 'too hard' pile. This is a possible turnaround at best, not an established compounder.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer