Arco Leasing (511038)

Asset Play

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3.75
Market Cap₹0.09 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE2.38%
ROE178.31%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-2,550%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-37.5%
SectorFinance

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me be candid: Arco Leasing fails the first test I apply—can I understand the business and trust the numbers? The price is ₹3.75, but market cap is shown as ₹0 Cr, and book value is unavailable. That means I cannot calculate price-to-book or ascertain whether the company has a net asset cushion. A Graham investor never buys without knowing the asset base. The reported P/E of 0.00 is meaningless because earnings are at zero or negative levels. In the latest quarter, sales were ₹0 Cr and net profit was ₹-0 Cr. Over the trailing period, sales have collapsed 37.50% and profit growth has turned -2550%, which implies a swing from profit to loss. An ROE of 178.31% looks spectacular at first glance, but when profit is negative, that kind of ROE usually comes from a tiny or negative equity base—it is a mathematical warning, not a sign of quality. ROCE is only 2.38%, so the underlying capital efficiency is poor. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 reinforces my caution: this is a financially weak business. There is no dividend to compensate shareholders, and promoter holding is not disclosed. In Buffett's language, this is not a wonderful business; it is a cigar butt with very little visible smoke. I cannot value it as a going concern because the operating engine has stalled. In Graham's framework, if I cannot compute book value and margins of safety, I refuse to speculate. The only possible attraction is an asset play—if the leasing book carries real liquidation value—but the data do not prove any such value. I would keep this on the too hard pile until audited financials reveal book value, debt, and shareholder structure.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer