Premier Cap Serv (511016)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹4.59 |
| Market Cap | ₹17.01 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -1.75% |
| ROE | -0.97% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 375% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹4.93 — ₹9.19 |
| Sector | Electrical Equipment |
| Book Value | ₹1.84 |
Strengths
- Book value per share of ₹1.84 provides a tangible asset baseline, though the price is well above it.
- The stock trades near the lower end of its 52-week range of ₹4.93-₹9.19, reducing some speculative expectations.
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests the company is not in complete financial distress on every metric.
Concerns
- Latest quarter shows ₹0 crore sales and ₹0 crore net profit, meaning there is no visible operating business generating cash flow.
- ROE of -0.97% and ROCE of -1.75% indicate the company is destroying shareholder value, not compounding it.
- At ₹4.59 against book value of ₹1.84, the price-to-book of 2.49 leaves no margin of safety for a loss-making entity.
- No dividend, no promoter holding disclosure, and insufficient data make this more speculation than investment.
AI Analysis
Let me look at Premier Cap Serv the way I look at any business: can I understand it, does it earn good returns on capital, and is the price sensible? Right away I am troubled. This is a ₹17 crore market-cap company in electrical equipment, yet the latest quarter shows ₹0 crore sales and ₹0 crore net profit. Sales growth is flat, and return on equity is -0.97% with ROCE at -1.75%. In other words, the enterprise is consuming capital, not creating it. A 375% profit-growth figure sounds impressive until you realize the base is essentially zero; I ignore such percentages. Book value is only ₹1.84, and the stock trades at ₹4.59, or 2.49 times book. That means I am being asked to pay a premium for an asset base that is earning a negative return. There is no dividend to compensate me while I wait. Promoter holding is not disclosed, so I cannot even see whether the people running it have skin in the game. The Piotroski score of 5 out of 9 is mediocre. Graham taught me to demand a margin of safety. Here I see none: negative returns, no revenue, and a price above book. The falling price and the 52-week range suggest the market is also voting against it. If this is a turnaround, I want proof in operating earnings, not in hopeful percentages. But no debt figure is available, so I can't fully assess balance-sheet risk. This is a pass for me. A great business must first earn a good return on capital; this one doesn't yet. I would rather wait for a better pitch.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer