Skyline Millars (505650)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹25 |
| Market Cap | ₹100.56 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -1.58% |
| ROE | -1.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 72.73% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹14.15 — ₹36.55 |
| Sector | Realty |
| Book Value | ₹6.85 |
Strengths
- Positive book value of ₹6.85 per share provides a tangible asset base, however far below the current price.
- Reported profit growth of 72.73%, though from a very low or negative base, indicates possible directional improvement.
- Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial health rather than outright distress.
- Quarterly sales of ₹1 Cr and near-zero losses mean the cash burn is not severe at the moment.
Concerns
- P/E is 0.00 and latest quarterly net profit is effectively ₹-0 Cr, so there are no real earnings to value.
- Negative ROE of -1.60% and ROCE of -1.58% show the business is destroying value on both equity and capital.
- Price of ₹25 is 3.65 times book value, leaving no margin of safety for a company with negative returns.
- No dividend and zero sales growth mean shareholders get no current income and no underlying growth.
AI Analysis
I look for businesses I can understand, with consistent earning power and a margin of safety. Skyline Millars fails on most counts. It trades at ₹25, or 3.65 times book value of ₹6.85, yet returns on equity and capital are negative — -1.60% and -1.58%. This is the opposite of what I want: paying a premium for a business that destroys value. The latest quarter shows sales of only ₹1 Cr and net profit of essentially ₹-0 Cr. A company with no real earnings cannot justify a price-to-earnings ratio; indeed, the P/E is meaningless at 0.00. The reported 72.73% profit growth is from a tiny or negative base, so I cannot trust it as a sign of momentum. There is no dividend, so the investor relies entirely on price appreciation. The Piotroski score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial health, but with no meaningful sales growth and no debt/equity data, I have little evidence of a durable moat or strong balance sheet. In real estate, value lies in location and cash flows; here I see neither. The market capitalization of ₹101 Cr against book value of about ₹6.85 per share implies the market is paying for assets or optionality. But as Graham would say, price is what you pay, value is what you get. At 3.65 times book with negative returns, I am not getting value. This is a speculative turnaround at best, not a compounder. I would wait for actual profits, positive ROE, and a price closer to or below book before considering it.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer