Skyline Millars (505650)
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹25 |
| Market Cap | ₹100.56 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | -1.58% |
| ROE | -1.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 72.73% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹14.15 — ₹36.55 |
| Sector | Realty |
| Book Value | ₹6.85 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
I look for businesses I can understand, with consistent earning power and a margin of safety. Skyline Millars fails on most counts. It trades at ₹25, or 3.65 times book value of ₹6.85, yet returns on equity and capital are negative — -1.60% and -1.58%. This is the opposite of what I want: paying a premium for a business that destroys value. The latest quarter shows sales of only ₹1 Cr and net profit of essentially ₹-0 Cr. A company with no real earnings cannot justify a price-to-earnings ratio; indeed, the P/E is meaningless at 0.00. The reported 72.73% profit growth is from a tiny or negative base, so I cannot trust it as a sign of momentum. There is no dividend, so the investor relies entirely on price appreciation. The Piotroski score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial health, but with no meaningful sales growth and no debt/equity data, I have little evidence of a durable moat or strong balance sheet. In real estate, value lies in location and cash flows; here I see neither. The market capitalization of ₹101 Cr against book value of about ₹6.85 per share implies the market is paying for assets or optionality. But as Graham would say, price is what you pay, value is what you get. At 3.65 times book with negative returns, I am not getting value. This is a speculative turnaround at best, not a compounder. I would wait for actual profits, positive ROE, and a price closer to or below book before considering it.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer