Vapi Enterprise (502589)
Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹242.3 |
| Market Cap | ₹58.13 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 17.46 |
| ROCE | 4.97% |
| ROE | 5.26% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | -21.43% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | -1.75% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹89.55 — ₹242.3 |
| Sector | Paper, Forest & Jute Products |
| Book Value | ₹153.13 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
Vapi Enterprise, with a market cap of ₹58 Cr and a price of ₹242.30, puzzles me. In Graham's words, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here, what I get is a small paper company with sales declining 1.75% and profits declining 21.43%. The latest quarter shows sales of just ₹1 Cr and net profit of ₹0 Cr. That is not an earning power story. Mr. Market has pushed this stock from ₹89.55 to its 52-week high of ₹242.30—almost a tripling—while the underlying business has no growth, no dividend, and weak returns: ROCE 4.97% and ROE 5.26%. A P/E of 17.46 on falling earnings is far from cheap. The Piotroski score of 3/9 strengthens my worry that financial health is weak. Book value of ₹153.13 means I would pay 1.58 times book for a business whose returns are poor. Buffett would ask, does this business have a moat or pricing power? Paper is a cyclical commodity, and no special advantage is visible in these figures. I cannot rely on debt/equity or promoter holding data, since they are not disclosed. Such unknowns reduce my confidence further. Maybe this is a turnaround play, but I don't invest on maybes. I need a margin of safety—either a lower price, higher returns on capital, or visible improvement in quarterly numbers. At ₹242.30, the market seems to expect a future that the current financials do not show. This is a pass for me.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer