3P Land Hold. (3PLAND)
Asset PlayScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹32.18 |
| Market Cap | ₹58.82 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 27.62 |
| ROCE | 2.31% |
| ROE | 1.32% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 5.26% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 4.3% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.3% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹28.51 — ₹47.5 |
| Sector | Finance |
| Book Value | ₹92.68 |
Strengths
- Stock trades at ₹36 against book value of ₹92.68 (P/B 0.39), giving a large book-value buffer.
- Promoter holding at 73.30% aligns interests and reduces promoter-agent risk.
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 points to sound financials and improving fundamentals.
- Positive, if modest, growth: sales up 4.30% and profits up 5.26%.
Concerns
- Core earnings are negligible: latest quarter sales ₹1 Cr and net profit ₹0 Cr, so the P/E of 27.62 is meaningless or excessive for income investors.
- ROE of 1.32% and ROCE of 2.31% show capital is earning far below a satisfactory return.
- No dividend yield means shareholders get no current income while waiting for value realisation.
- Data is incomplete (FairStock Score INSUFFICIENT_DATA, Debt/Equity N/A), making asset quality and liabilities hard to verify.
AI Analysis
When I look at 3P Land Hold, the first number that leaps off the page is the book value: ₹92.68 per share against a price of ₹36. That is a rupee of assets available at 39 paise. In Graham's language, that is a margin of safety. But I have learned that a cheap asset is only worth what it can earn or what someone will pay to own it. Here the earnings engine is nearly silent. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹1 crore and net profit of ₹0 crore. For the year, ROE is 1.32% and ROCE is 2.31%. This business is not compounding wealth; it is sitting on assets, waiting. A P/E of 27.62 on such tiny profits tells me the market is pricing the land, not the income stream. The 4.30% sales growth and 5.26% profit growth are positive but too small to justify a PEG of 5.78. Promoter holding of 73.30% is a double-edged sword: it aligns owners with shareholders, but the small free float can distort pricing. The Piotroski score of 7/9 is comforting from a balance-sheet perspective, but it does not tell me the true market value of the land or the carrying cost of holding it. With no dividend yield, the investor is asked to be very patient. I would not call this a great business under my definition—great businesses earn high returns on capital. 3P Land is a classic asset play. My job is to estimate the real value of that land and the likelihood of monetisation. The figures alone do not prove a bargain; they only show a possible one. I would dig deeper into asset valuations, related-party dealings, and speed of capital recycling before committing a rupee.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer