Yelp Inc. Common Stock (YELP)
StalwartFairStock Score: 59/100 — STEADY
Key Financials
| Current Price | $21.65 |
| Market Cap | $1.6B |
| P/E Ratio | 9.93 |
| ROE | 20.45% |
| Dividend Yield | —% |
| Sector | Communication Services |
Strengths
- Generates $321 million in annual free cash flow (20.4% yield on market cap)
- High return on equity of 20.0% demonstrating efficient capital deployment
- Conservative balance sheet with debt-to-equity of just 0.04, providing financial flexibility
Concerns
- Revenue declining at 0.5% year-over-year signals potential demand weakness or market share loss
AI Analysis
Yelp Inc. Common Stock is a micro-cap communication services company valued at $1.6 billion. The business generates $1.5 billion in annual revenue with a 2.6% net margin and $321 million in free cash flow. From a quality standpoint, Yelp shows solid Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and Altman Z-Score of 2.9 in the grey zone. On valuation, the stock is attractively valued at 12.6x earnings, with trades above its Graham Number with a negative 15% margin. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at -0.5% and profit growth of -10.5%. Our composite FairStock Score of 59/100 reflects mixed fundamentals overall. This combination of reasonable valuation, solid returns, and conservative leverage makes it worth a closer look for value-oriented portfolios.
Bull Case
The market underappreciates Yelp's consistent 20% ROE at just 13x earnings—a re-rating toward sector peers could unlock 30-50% upside. With $321 million in annual free cash flow (20.4% yield), management has ample capital for buybacks, dividends, or accretive acquisitions.
Bear Case
Macro headwinds or sector-specific disruption could pressure margins, particularly if competitive intensity increases in the communication services space. Regulatory changes, input cost inflation, or demand normalization represent underappreciated risks that could materially impact forward estimates.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer