Vardhman Textile (VTL)

Slow Grower

FairStock Score: 61/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹590.6
Market Cap₹17,096.44 Cr
P/E Ratio19.84
ROCE10.83%
ROE8.06%
Dividend Yield0.85%
Profit Growth41.38%
Debt/Equity0.18
Sales Growth12.7%
Free Cash Flow₹752 Cr
Promoter Holding64.44%
52-Week Range₹385.5 — ₹688
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹369.41

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me start with the balance sheet, because that is where Benjamin Graham always looked first. Vardhman has debt-to-equity of just 0.15, free cash flow of ₹752 Cr, and a Piotroski score of 7 out of 9. That tells me the company is financially sound, and promoter holding of 64.44% is a positive sign for minority shareholders. Altman Z-score of 2.66 puts it in the safe zone, though not with a wide margin. But sound is not the same as cheap. The company earns an ROE of only 8.06% and ROCE of 10.83%. In a textile business, where products are largely commodity-like and pricing power is scarce, those returns do not suggest a durable economic moat. Growth is also modest: recent sales rose 3.74%, profits barely moved at 0.64%, and while the five-year revenue CAGR of 9.77% is respectable, the current pace is far slower. At ₹569.40, the stock trades at 19.67 times earnings. The Graham number, a conservative valuation based on book value and earnings power, is ₹460.94, implying a margin of safety of negative 17.7%. The PEG ratio of 7.24 is unattractive for this level of growth, and the DCF intrinsic value of ₹69.36 is far below the market price. EV/EBITDA of 77.90 further confirms that the market has priced in expectations I cannot justify. This is the classic value investor dilemma: a reasonable business, conservatively run, but offered at a price that leaves no room for error. I would rather wait for a margin of safety nearer the Graham number or lower. Until then, Vardhman is a company to admire from afar, not a stock to buy.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer