Vishnusurya Pro. (VISHNUINFR)

FairStock Score: 25/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• Sales growth of 20.85% shows decent demand momentum in the construction-materials space.
• P/E of 13.44 and PEG near 1.01 are reasonable if growth can be sustained.
• Promoter holding of 59.06% aligns owner interests with minority shareholders.
• Piotroski F-score of 6/9 suggests acceptable financial health based on available data.
• Latest quarter net profit of ₹23 Cr on sales of ₹168 Cr implies a healthy quarterly margin, though sustainability is unproven.

Concerns

• Profit growth of 5.87% lags sales growth of 20.85%, indicating margin compression.
• ROCE is reported as 0.00% and key metrics like book value, ROE, and debt/equity are unavailable, making capital efficiency and leverage unverifiable.
• The share is 26% below its 52-week high of ₹218.90, which may reflect cyclical weakness or market skepticism.
• Quarterly profit of ₹23 Cr is far above the roughly ₹31 Cr trailing earnings implied by the P/E, suggesting lumpy or non-recurring earnings.

AI Analysis

At ₹162, Vishnusurya Pro is a small construction-materials company with a market cap of ₹412 crore and a trailing P/E of 13.44. That looks inexpensive, but cheapness must be supported by financial facts. The trailing earnings implied by the multiple are roughly ₹31 crore, yet the latest quarter produced ₹23 crore in net profit. I cannot simply annualize that; construction and materials businesses are lumpy and quarterly numbers can mislead. Sales grew 20.85%, which is encouraging, but profit grew only 5.87%. That gap tells me the company is not yet converting topline momentum into bottom-line progress. As Graham would say, the figures should speak, and here they speak of margin pressure and perhaps weakening pricing power. The reported ROCE is 0.00%, and with no book value, ROE, or debt-equity ratio available, I cannot judge whether the company is earning a proper return on invested capital or how much leverage it carries. I refuse to invest on faith when balance-sheet information is missing. Promoter holding of 59.06% is reassuring; owners have skin in the game. A Piotroski F-score of 6 out of 9 is acceptable and hints at reasonably sound fundamentals. The PEG ratio near 1.01 suggests the valuation is broadly fair for 20% sales growth, but profit growth closer to 6% makes that PEG misleading if the margin compression continues. This is essentially a cyclical construction-materials business. It may do well in an infrastructure upcycle, but it has no obvious moat. At 13.4 times earnings with a 0.60% dividend yield and a share price 26% below its 52-week high, it is neither a deep value bargain nor a proven compounder. I would wait for a brighter balance-sheet and consistent margins before accepting the low multiple as a real margin of safety.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer