Uravi Defence & (URAVIDEF)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹108.82 |
| Market Cap | ₹124.05 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 113.35 |
| ROCE | 0% |
| ROE | 4.51% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 67.6% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.47 |
| Sales Growth | 4.1% |
| Promoter Holding | 54.19% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹100.75 — ₹399.5 |
| Sector | Auto Components |
| Book Value | ₹44.93 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 8.54% shows some top-line momentum.
- Promoter holding at 54.19% aligns management with minority shareholders.
- Debt/equity of 0.45 is manageable.
- Book value of ₹33.24 indicates the company still has a positive net worth.
Concerns
- Profit growth of -77.14% and latest quarter net profit near ₹0 Cr show severe earnings deterioration.
- ROE of only 4.51% and ROCE of 0.00% fail any capital-efficiency test.
- P/E of 80.75, P/B of 4.37, and PEG of 9.46 imply expensive valuation despite collapsed profits.
- Piotroski F-score of 3/9 and zero dividend yield add no safety cushion.
AI Analysis
At first glance, Uravi Defence looks like a fallen growth story—down from ₹509 to ₹145 in a year. But in investing, a falling price is only interesting if the underlying business is worth more. Here, the numbers fail Graham's basic tests. The company earned just 4.51% on equity in the latest year, and ROCE is zero. That means the business is not generating real returns on the capital it employs. Sales grew 8.54%, but profits fell 77.14%; the latest quarter's net profit is essentially zero. This is a classic case of a company spending money to grow but failing to earn a decent rupee of profit. With a P/E around 80.75 and a PEG of 9.46, the market is still pricing in heroic future growth. But where is that growth? Not in the bottom line. Book value is ₹33.24, so paying ₹145.20 means 4.37 times net assets for a deteriorating earner. There is no dividend yield—shareholders aren't even being paid to wait. On the positive side, debt is not excessive—D/E at 0.45—and promoter holding is 54.19%, so interest alignment exists. But promoter ownership does not create a moat. The Piotroski F-score of 3/9 screams weak balance-sheet fundamentals and poor operating efficiency. A Graham disciple would demand a margin of safety; this stock offers almost none. It might be a turnaround candidate if management can fix margins and capital allocation, but I do not bank on turnarounds with zero return on capital. For an Indian retail investor, patience is better: wait for proof in profit numbers, or wait for a lower price. Value is not a falling stock; it's a growing stream of earnings at a reasonable price. Here, the earnings stream has broken.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer