Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN)
TurnaroundFairStock Score: 25/100 — RISKY
Key Financials
| Current Price | $65.79 |
| Market Cap | $21.5B |
| P/E Ratio | 51.8 |
| ROE | 2.62% |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive |
Strengths
- Strong free cash flow of $1.2B provides operational flexibility and supports dividend sustainability
- Diversified portfolio across beef, pork, chicken, and prepared foods reduces single-commodity risk
- Low beta of 0.44 indicates defensive characteristics during market downturns
- Reasonable leverage with D/E of 0.46 and solid Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 suggests financial stability
- Market leader in North American protein with 133,000 employees and global distribution
Concerns
- Valuation is indefensible: trading at 3.5x Graham Number with -255% margin of safety and P/E of 103.89
- Profitability is collapsing with net margins of 0.59% and ROE/ROCE under 2.5%, destroying shareholder capital
- Commodity exposure in proteins offers virtually no competitive moat with intense price competition
- Missing EPS and growth data suggests earnings instability; net income barely positive relative to revenue scale
- Altman Z-Score of 1.98 indicates distress zone risk despite seemingly stable balance sheet
AI Analysis
Tyson Foods presents a classic value trap dressed in defensive clothing. On the surface, we see a $21.5B company with modest leverage (0.46 D/E), reasonable free cash flow of $1.2B, and a low beta of 0.44 suggesting stability. However, the financial metrics tell a troubling story that demands our scrutiny. The P/E ratio of 103.89 is astronomical—far beyond what any rational investor should pay for a commodity-exposed protein processor. More concerning is the abysmal profitability: a 0.59% net margin in the latest quarter and near-zero net income of $85M on $14.3B revenue. With ROE of 1.26% and ROCE of 2.17%, management is destroying shareholder value, not creating it. The Graham Number of $16.97 versus the current price of $60.24 represents a staggering -255% margin of safety—we're paying 3.5x what fundamental analysis suggests the company is worth. While the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicates reasonable operational health and the EV/EBITDA of 47x suggests hidden earnings power, the reality is that thin margins in commodity meat processing offer little competitive moat. This is a deteriorating business caught in cyclical headwinds with no durable advantage. I see no margin of safety here, only the illusion of defensive stability masking fundamental weakness.
Bull Case
A turnaround narrative could emerge if management successfully shifts mix toward higher-margin prepared foods and value-added products while commodity protein prices stabilize. At current valuations following recent correction, the 3.2% FCF yield combined with potential operational improvements could reward patient investors if margins recover even modestly toward historical 3-4% levels.
Bear Case
Continued margin compression driven by feed costs, labor inflation, and oversupply in protein markets could force dividend cuts and impairment charges. The company risks becoming a value destruction machine if it cannot escape commodity dynamics, potentially justifying valuations closer to the Graham Number of $16.97.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer