Transworld Shipp (TRANSWORLD)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹155.75 |
| Market Cap | ₹341.99 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 0 |
| ROCE | 6.83% |
| ROE | -5.65% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% |
| Profit Growth | -271.41% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.45 |
| Sales Growth | 8% |
| Promoter Holding | 70.44% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹111.56 — ₹270.99 |
| Sector | Transport Services |
| Book Value | ₹306.85 |
Strengths
- Price of ₹175.75 is just 0.49 times book value of ₹358.08, offering asset-backing cushion.
- Debt/equity of 0.38 is relatively conservative for a shipping company.
- Promoter holding of 70.44% aligns management with minority shareholders.
- Positive ROCE of 6.83% suggests some operational earning power before financing costs.
- Small dividend yield of 1.08% provides a token return despite the downturn.
Concerns
- Negative ROE of -5.65% and latest quarterly net loss of ₹25 Cr; profit growth down -271.41%.
- Sales declined -19.88%, indicating a weak operating environment.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 points to poor fundamental health and possible financial stress.
- Shipping is capital-intensive and commoditized, offering little pricing power or durable moat.
AI Analysis
I try to buy a business at a sensible price with a durable moat and capable, honest managers. Transworld fails the moat test: shipping is a capital-intensive, commodity-like business where prices are set by global tides rather than by any brand or pricing power. The financial statements confirm the cycle is against it. Sales fell nearly 20%, profits swung to negative 271% growth, and the latest quarter lost ₹25 Cr on sales of ₹132 Cr. ROE is -5.65%, so equity is shrinking, and the Piotroski score of 3/9 tells me the fundamentals are weak. The one attraction is the balance sheet: debt/equity of only 0.38, book value of ₹358 per share, and a price of ₹175.75, or 0.49 times book. That gives some asset protection if the losses do not erode book value too quickly. Promoters hold 70.44%, so interests are aligned, and a small 1.08% dividend provides a token return. But in Graham's language, I want asset protection plus satisfactory earning power. Transworld with current losses has the first but not the second. I would not treat a low P/B as sufficient margin of safety in a volatile shipping cycle; book assets may be worth less if the downturn persists. This is a cyclical, not a franchise. I'd wait for evidence that the loss cycle has bottomed and capital allocation is focused on reducing debt and protecting net worth. In the meantime, the numbers say patience, not purchase.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer