Tata Motors (TMCV)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 20/100 — RISKY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹474.3
Market Cap₹1,74,670.47 Cr
P/E Ratio41.68
ROCE0%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0.84%
Profit Growth83.4%
Debt/Equity0.44
Sales Growth19.3%
Promoter Holding42.56%
52-Week Range₹306.3 — ₹509
SectorAgricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles
Book Value₹34.58

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹431.85, Tata Motors commands a market cap of ₹1.86 lakh crore, yet the trailing earnings justify a P/E of 408.60. That is not the kind of number Graham would call a margin of safety. Book value is just ₹27.83, so I am being asked to pay 15.52 times book for a business whose return on capital is essentially zero. ROCE is 0.00%, and ROE is not even calculable. This is a capital-intensive commercial-vehicle cycler, not a compounding machine. The recent growth looks encouraging: sales up 19.74%, profit up 31.66%, and the latest quarter shows ₹20,404 crore of sales with ₹561 crore of net profit. But that net margin is under 3%, and one strong quarter in a cyclical upswing is not proof of durable earning power. Debt/equity of 0.88 means the balance sheet carries real leverage. At 21.32 times EV/EBITDA, the market is placing a rich multiple on cyclical earnings. The PEG of 10.29 reinforces that today's growth is more than fully priced. What do I like? Promoter holding is solid at 42.56%, and the Piotroski F-score of 6 suggests improving fundamentals, though not exceptional. Tata has a franchise in Indian commercial vehicles, and if the cycle continues, profits could surprise. But I do not pay a P/E of 400 for cyclical peaks, nor do I rely on hope. With zero dividend yield, I am not paid to wait. This is a cyclical business with a valuation that embeds perfection. In Graham's language, I would wait for a price that offers a margin of safety. Today, that margin is missing.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer