Tube Investments (TIINDIA)

Cyclical

FairStock Score: 46/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹2,733.5
Market Cap₹52,912.99 Cr
P/E Ratio87.72
ROCE21.8%
ROE10.8%
Dividend Yield0.16%
Profit Growth-5.63%
Debt/Equity0.28
Sales Growth17.42%
Free Cash Flow₹-402 Cr
Promoter Holding44.06%
52-Week Range₹2,006 — ₹3,335
SectorAuto Components
Book Value₹400.48

AI Analysis

AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.

As a value investor, I start with the business and the price. Tube Investments, an auto-components maker, has real scale: ₹52,913 Cr market cap, latest quarterly sales of ₹5,801 Cr and net profit of ₹279 Cr. Its five-year revenue CAGR of 32.59% and sales growth of 17.42% show it has grown, but profit growth is -5.63%, so the bottom line is not keeping pace. The balance sheet looks respectable: debt/equity of 0.28, ROCE 21.80%, ROE 10.80%, Piotroski F-Score 7/9, Altman Z-Score 4.14. That suggests financial staying power, though free cash flow is negative at ₹-402 Cr. A true moat would show up in consistent cash generation; here I need more evidence. Valuation is the problem. At ₹2733.50, P/E is 87.72, P/B is 6.83, and book value is ₹400.48. Graham Number is ₹446.18, so margin of safety is -517.11%—I am paying many times the defensive value. PEG of 25.52 and EV/EBITDA of -30.30 reinforce the price risk. Dividend yield is only 0.16%, so little cash return. Promoter holding of 44.06% is meaningful. The 52-week range ₹2164.90–₹3335.00 shows volatility. FairStock Score 46/100 is mixed. This may be a fast grower, but growth must eventually convert to profit and cash. At this price, I see more speculation than margin of safety. I would watch profit recovery, FCF turning positive, and valuation cooling before considering it.

The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer