Sumitomo Chemi. (SUMICHEM)

Slow Grower

FairStock Score: 61/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹564.95
Market Cap₹28,199.24 Cr
P/E Ratio48.54
ROCE25.14%
ROE18.33%
Dividend Yield0.23%
Profit Growth20.42%
Debt/Equity0.02
Sales Growth1.33%
Free Cash Flow₹61 Cr
Promoter Holding75%
52-Week Range₹362.6 — ₹617.45
SectorFertilizers & Agrochemicals
Book Value₹67.91

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

As a value investor, I search for a fair price on a wonderful business. Sumitomo Chemi has some wonderful traits. The 75% Sumitomo parentage gives strategic backing and product credibility, and the financials confirm discipline: return on equity of 18.33%, return on capital employed of 25.14%, and a debt-equity ratio of 0.02. The Altman Z-score of 5.13 and Piotroski score of 7 out of 9 indicate a healthy, conservatively run company. Yet I must not confuse a good business with a good investment. The price is ₹447.60, which means 36.92 times trailing earnings and 7.71 times book value. Meanwhile, the company is hardly growing: sales are up only 2.88%, profit up 3.54%, and the five-year revenue CAGR is 3.55%. This is a slow grower, not a compounding gem. Benjamin Graham taught me to use margin of safety. Here, the Graham number is ₹117.81 and the DCF value is ₹11.99, implying a margin of safety of negative 240.5%. Even the EV/EBITDA of 29.42 leaves no cushion. Free cash flow of ₹61 Cr against a ₹20,023 Cr market cap is a 0.3% cash yield, and the 0.30% dividend adds little reward for waiting. The balance sheet protects me from bankruptcy risk, but it does not protect me from paying too much. If I pay 36 times earnings for 3.5% growth, my returns will be poor for years. I would wait for a meaningful discount to intrinsic value, or for proof that growth has genuinely accelerated. Until then, this is a quality business trading as an expensive promise.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer