Studds Accessor. (STUDDS)
CyclicalFairStock Score: 34/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹425.25 |
| Market Cap | ₹1,673.5 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 22.42 |
| ROCE | 22.59% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.71% |
| Profit Growth | -39.3% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.02 |
| Sales Growth | 13.2% |
| Promoter Holding | 61.75% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹386.2 — ₹600 |
| Sector | Auto Components |
| Book Value | ₹132.86 |
AI Analysis
AI-generated, general educational analysis — not personal investment advice.
When I look at Studds, I see a fundamentally sound business but a price that leaves little margin of safety. The balance sheet is conservative—debt-to-equity of just 0.02—and a return on capital employed of 22.59% tells me management deploys capital efficiently. Profits are compounding at 26.26%, far outpacing sales growth of 9.42%, which raises a question: is this real growth or just cost discipline? The latest quarter shows net profit of ₹21 Cr on sales of ₹163 Cr, a healthy margin. Promoter holding of 61.75% aligns their interests with mine, and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 adds comfort on financial health. But valuation is demanding. A P/E of 27.64 and a PEG of 1.55 imply the market already expects this growth to continue. Paying 4.04 times book value of ₹122.05 would make Graham uneasy, and with a dividend yield of zero, my entire return depends on price appreciation. The FairStock score of 34/100 is a red flag I cannot ignore. This is a good company, perhaps, but not a good price. I would need a meaningful margin of safety before committing hard-earned capital. For now, I'd watch from the sidelines, waiting for either a cheaper entry point or proof that sales growth can catch up with profit growth.
The full AI analysis, bull and bear case and key monitorables are in FairStock Pro.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer