Sterlite Tech. (STLTECH)
TurnaroundFairStock Score: 17/100 — RISKY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹647.75 |
| Market Cap | ₹33,288.6 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 140.82 |
| ROCE | 2.86% |
| ROE | -2.13% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 1,755% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.86 |
| Sales Growth | 87.4% |
| Promoter Holding | 44.44% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹84.6 — ₹900.15 |
| Sector | Telecom - Equipment & Accessories |
| Book Value | ₹46.46 |
Strengths
- Sales growth of 25.95% shows business momentum in the latest reported period
- Promoter holding of 44.44% aligns management interests with minority shareholders
- Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests recent improvement in financial fundamentals
- Latest quarter sales of ₹1,257 Cr indicates a sizeable operating base
Concerns
- P/E of 647.47 with a latest quarterly net loss of ₹17 Cr makes earnings valuation indefensible
- Negative ROE of -2.13% and ROCE of only 2.86% show poor capital efficiency
- P/B of 5.40 and PEG of 16.33 imply a large premium for unproven growth
- No dividend, debt/equity of 0.94, and FairStock Score of 18/100 add to the speculative risk
AI Analysis
When I look at Sterlite Tech, I do not see value; I see hope dressed up as a number. At ₹276.45, the market is asking me to pay 647 times earnings for a company whose latest quarter delivered a net loss of ₹17 crore. That is not an investment, it is speculation. Graham taught me that price is what you pay, value is what you get—and here the value is hard to anchor. The company did grow revenue by 25.95%, and the reported profit growth of 53.33% sounds nice, but with negative net profit in the quarter, I need to see actual earnings before I pay for them. Book value is ₹51.19, yet the stock trades at 5.4 times book. That premium might be justified for a wonderful business, but this one earns a negative ROE of -2.13% and a ROCE of just 2.86%. In other words, the capital employed is not producing an acceptable return. The debt-to-equity of 0.94 is manageable, but with no dividend and zero yield, my wait is not compensated. I do acknowledge some positives: promoter holding of 44.44% aligns owners with minority shareholders, and a Piotroski score of 7/9 suggests the financial health has strengthened recently. But the PEG ratio of 16.33 tells me that even the growth, if it comes, is priced at a ridiculous premium. The 52-week range of ₹84.60 to ₹685.00 shows a market that is emotionally unstable, not a business with intrinsic stability. In Buffett's language, this is a cigar butt with too many puffs required. I will not guess when profit turns positive. I need margin of safety, and this stock does not offer it. If the company proves over the next few quarters that it can convert sales growth into net profit, I will revisit. Until then, I watch and wait.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer