Shankar Lal Ram. (SRD)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 1/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹40.5 |
| Market Cap | ₹259.07 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 19.19 |
| ROCE | 14.08% |
| ROE | 11.61% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% |
| Profit Growth | 92.8% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.21 |
| Sales Growth | 30.5% |
| Promoter Holding | 73.61% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹35 — ₹76.7 |
| Sector | Chemicals & Petrochemicals |
| Book Value | ₹19.18 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 73.61% aligns owner-manager interests.
- ROCE of 14.08% indicates reasonably efficient use of capital.
- Latest quarter remains profitable with ₹2 crore net profit despite the slowdown.
- The stock has corrected sharply from its 52-week high of ₹91, reducing some speculative froth.
Concerns
- Sales growth of -11.14% and profit growth of -27.27% show clear business deterioration.
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests poor financial health and operational stress.
- Valuation remains expensive at P/E 24.48 and P/B 2.85 despite falling earnings, with a negligible 0.12% dividend yield.
- Trading businesses typically lack pricing power or durable moats, making them vulnerable to cyclical downturns.
AI Analysis
Let me look at Shankar Lal Ram as a business, not a ticker. It is a chemical trader with ₹91 crore in latest quarter sales and only ₹2 crore net profit—an operating margin around 2%. This is inherently a low-margin, price-taking business. In a commodity trading environment, you are at the mercy of chemical prices and demand. Sales are down 11.14% and profits fell 27.27%; that tells me the business is shrinking, not compounding. A P/E of 24.48 for a company with declining earnings is hardly a bargain. At ₹44.33, I am paying 2.85 times book value of ₹15.58, but book value matters less for a distributor with no pricing power. The Piotroski F-Score of 3 out of 9 raises red flags about financial health; the latest quarter's profit is only ₹2 crore, so quality is deteriorating. The 0.12% dividend means I get almost no return while waiting. On the positive side, ROCE of 14.08% is respectable, and promoter holding of 73.61% at least aligns owners with management. But high ownership doesn't create a moat. The stock has fallen from ₹91 to ₹44.33, yet the earning power has also fallen. In Graham's language, price is what you pay, value is what you get. Here I don't see a margin of safety. This is a cyclical trading business in a down phase; unless I see sales and margins stabilise and evidence of pricing power, I would rather watch from the sidelines. Chemistry is not my edge; simple economics are.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer