Sona BLW Precis. (SONACOMS)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 59/100 — STEADY
Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹792 |
| Market Cap | ₹49,412.14 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 70.9 |
| ROCE | 17.82% |
| ROE | 11.14% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.45% |
| Profit Growth | 83.22% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.07 |
| Sales Growth | 53.92% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹-987 Cr |
| Promoter Holding | 28.02% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹402.3 — ₹843.9 |
| Sector | Auto Components |
| Book Value | ₹96.21 |
Strengths
- Negligible leverage: Debt/Equity of 0.04 provides financial cushion
- Strong solvency: Altman Z-Score of 5.01 indicates very low bankruptcy risk
- Good capital allocation: ROCE of 17.82% and Piotroski F-Score of 8/9
- Decent topline momentum: 5-year revenue CAGR of 17.76% and latest quarter sales of ₹1,200 Cr
Concerns
- Extreme valuation: P/E of 50.95 vs profit growth of only 5.39% implies an unsustainable PEG
- Negative free cash flow of ₹-987 Cr despite reported profits
- No margin of safety: Graham Number of ₹143.25 vs price ₹574.55
- Moderate promoter holding of 28.02% and low dividend yield of 0.60%
AI Analysis
When I look at Sona BLW, I see a quality business with an excellent balance sheet but a price that leaves nothing to chance. The company has virtually no debt—D/E of just 0.04—and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, suggesting strong financial discipline. Return on capital employed of 17.82% is respectable, and an Altman Z-Score of 5.01 indicates very low bankruptcy risk. Over five years, revenue has compounded at 17.76%, and latest quarter sales of ₹1,200 Cr with net profit of ₹150 Cr show the business is operating at scale. Yet I must be honest: at ₹574.55, the market is asking me to pay 50.95 times earnings and 6.50 times book value. Profit growth has been just 5.39%, meaning the PEG ratio is absurdly high. Free cash flow is deeply negative at ₹-987 Cr, which tells me earnings are not translating into cash for owners—a major red flag in my book. The Graham Number of ₹143.25 suggests a margin of safety of negative 273%; I would be buying at nearly four times what a conservative net-net approach would justify. The promoter holding of 28.02% is lower than I like to see in an Indian company, and the dividend yield of 0.60% offers little income support. This is a well-run, growing auto-component player, but the market has already priced in stellar future growth. As Graham said, the margin of safety is the investor's best friend. Here, that friend is absent. I would wait for a far lower entry point or a marked improvement in free cash flow and profit growth before committing a rupee.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer