Smith-Midland Corporation Common Stock (SMID)
Fast GrowerFairStock Score: 83/100 — HIGH CONVICTION
Key Financials
| Current Price | $30.7 |
| Market Cap | $177M |
| P/E Ratio | 13.01 |
| ROE | 26.04% |
| Dividend Yield | —% |
| Sector | Basic Materials |
Strengths
- High return on equity of 26.0% demonstrating efficient capital deployment
- Conservative balance sheet with debt-to-equity of just 0.08, providing financial flexibility
- Altman Z-Score of 4.8 confirms minimal bankruptcy risk and strong solvency
- Revenue growth of 24.7% demonstrates strong top-line momentum
- FairStock composite score of 83/100 places it in the top tier across value, quality, and momentum factors
AI Analysis
Smith-Midland Corporation Common Stock is a micro-cap basic materials company valued at $177 million. Revenue stands at $93 million. From a quality standpoint, Smith-Midland shows solid Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and healthy Altman Z-Score of 4.8. On valuation, the stock is attractively valued at 14.0x earnings, with trades above its Graham Number with a negative 43% margin. Growth dynamics show revenue growing at 24.7% and profit growth of 52.5%. Our composite FairStock Score of 83/100 reflects strong fundamentals overall. This combination of reasonable valuation, solid returns, and conservative leverage makes it worth a closer look for value-oriented portfolios.
Bull Case
Smith-Midland's 25% revenue growth trajectory could accelerate as it captures additional market share in the basic materials sector. Operational leverage in the business model means incremental revenue growth could disproportionately boost bottom-line profitability.
Bear Case
Macro headwinds or sector-specific disruption could pressure margins, particularly if competitive intensity increases in the basic materials space. Regulatory changes, input cost inflation, or demand normalization represent underappreciated risks that could materially impact forward estimates.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer