S J Logistics (I (SJLOGISTIC)

FairStock Score: 60/100 — STEADY

Score breakdown: P/E: 3/3 · ROCE: 2/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Strengths

• P/E of 7.75 with 42.45% profit growth gives a very low PEG of 0.22
• ROCE of 36.55% indicates strong capital efficiency
• Latest quarter sales of ₹157 Cr and net profit of ₹18 Cr show continued momentum, with profit growth outpacing sales growth
• Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests solid operational health
• Promoter holding of 49.10% provides meaningful insider alignment

Concerns

• Zero dividend yield means returns depend entirely on growth and valuation re-rating
• No book value, debt/equity, or ROE data available; balance sheet risk cannot be assessed
• Small market cap of ₹476 Cr and a 52-week range of ₹225.35-₹459.00 indicate volatility and potential cyclicality
• Logistics is a competitive, low-moat business; high growth may attract capacity and compress margins

AI Analysis

At first glance, this is the kind of small-cap that tempts me: S J Logistics trades at ₹317.85, a P/E of only 7.75 against 42.45% profit growth and 26.52% sales growth. A PEG of 0.22 suggests the market is paying very little for growth. ROCE of 36.55% shows capital efficiency; latest quarter sales of ₹157 Cr and net profit of ₹18 Cr reinforce momentum. Piotroski 7/9 gives me confidence in operational quality. As Graham would say, though, the margin of safety is in the balance sheet. Here I lack book value, debt/equity and ROE, so I cannot verify asset quality or leverage. Promoter holding of 49.10% is decent but not overwhelming; I would watch for pledges. Zero dividend yield means my only return comes from earnings and valuation, not cash in hand. The 52-week range of ₹225.35-₹459.00 reminds me this is a volatile small-cap; 42% profit growth in a logistics sector can quickly reverse if capacity, competition, or fuel costs turn adverse. I like that profit growth outpaces sales growth – operating leverage is real – but I want to know why. Is it pricing power, route efficiency, or temporary factors? The low P/E could be a bargain or a value trap. I cannot call this a Graham-style asset play because there is no book value to anchor my calculation. Still, with P/E 7.75, PEG 0.22, and Piotroski 7/9, it deserves a place on my watchlist. I would need at least two more quarters of profit and cash-flow consistency, plus clarity on debt, before deploying capital. If the business can keep earning 36% ROCE while growing, this could be a fast grower at a reasonable price.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer