Salona Cotspin (SALONA)
TurnaroundScore breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹259.62 |
| Market Cap | ₹136.62 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 87.71 |
| ROCE | 7.41% |
| ROE | 25.43% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% |
| Profit Growth | 47.35% |
| Debt/Equity | 2.26 |
| Sales Growth | 25.15% |
| Promoter Holding | 68.42% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹208.85 — ₹320 |
| Sector | Textiles & Apparels |
| Book Value | ₹158.93 |
Strengths
- Promoter holding of 68.42% ensures owner-operator alignment and long-term commitment.
- Price-to-book of 1.16 and book value of ₹232.23 mean the market price is only modestly above stated net assets.
- Quarterly sales of ₹155 Cr show the company still has a meaningful operating base despite its troubles.
- Reported ROE of 25.43% indicates the equity base has historically generated high returns, though leverage is a major caveat.
Concerns
- P/E of 1000 and latest quarter net profit of ₹0 Cr mean current earning power is almost nil.
- Debt/equity of 2.78 combined with ROCE of 7.41% shows high leverage and low return on capital.
- Profit growth of -79.11% and Piotroski F-score of 3/9 point to deteriorating fundamentals.
- Dividend yield of 0.38% offers negligible income to shareholders.
AI Analysis
At ₹270, Salona Cotspin carries a market cap of just ₹139 Cr. The first thing I see is a P/E of 1000 and a latest quarter where net profit is ₹0 Cr on ₹155 Cr of sales. That tells me earning power has collapsed; profit growth is down 79.11%. A P/B of 1.16 and book value of ₹232.23 look cheap, but Graham would ask whether the book value is real after liabilities. With debt/equity at 2.78, the balance sheet is heavily leveraged. ROCE of 7.41% is not an impressive return on the capital employed, while the reported 25.43% ROE is flattered by leverage rather than by business quality. This is a commodity textile business, and I see no durable moat, no pricing power, and no reliable earnings. Sales growth is slightly negative at -1.77%, and the Piotroski F-score of 3/9 reinforces my concern about deteriorating financial health. Promoter holding of 68.42% is a positive, as owners have skin in the game, but good intentions cannot repay debt or create lasting competitive advantage. Dividend yield of 0.38% is negligible. At ₹270, the market is not asking a large premium over book value, yet with leverage and zero quarterly profits, any asset-based margin of safety is thin. This is not a business I would call a growing franchise; it is a potential turnaround, but only for someone willing to accept high risk. I would wait for proof of sustainable profits, lower debt, and a ROCE that covers the cost of capital before acting.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer