Sadhav Shipping (SADHAV)
CyclicalScore breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1
Key Financials
| Current Price | ₹216.2 |
| Market Cap | ₹310.3 Cr |
| P/E Ratio | 14.25 |
| ROCE | 13.45% |
| ROE | —% |
| Dividend Yield | 0% |
| Profit Growth | 0% |
| Debt/Equity | — |
| Sales Growth | 0% |
| Promoter Holding | 69.44% |
| 52-Week Range | ₹86.3 — ₹216.2 |
| Sector | Transport Services |
Strengths
- Promoter holding is high at 69.44%, aligning management with minority shareholders.
- P/E of 14.25 is modest for a profitable quarter with net profit of ₹7 Cr on sales of ₹28 Cr.
- ROCE of 13.45% indicates decent capital efficiency relative to the sector.
- Latest quarter shows strong net margin of 25%, suggesting pricing power or cost control in the current cycle.
Concerns
- Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 signals weak financial health and potential balance sheet strain.
- Zero sales growth and zero profit growth indicate a stalled business, not a compounding one.
- No dividend yield means shareholders get no cash return while waiting for cyclical recovery.
- Critical financial data like book value, debt/equity, and ROE are unavailable, preventing a thorough Graham-style margin-of-safety analysis.
AI Analysis
When I look at Sadhav Shipping, I see a classic cyclical business in a notoriously volatile industry. At ₹116.65, the market cap is ₹162 Cr against a P/E of 14.25. That seems reasonable on the surface, but I am immediately cautious. The latest quarter shows sales of ₹28 Cr and net profit of ₹7 Cr — a healthy 25% margin, but shipping margins can evaporate when freight rates turn. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 is a red flag; it tells me the financial health is weak, and I have no book value or debt-to-equity data to judge the balance sheet properly. That is not a margin of safety; it is a leap of faith. Sales growth and profit growth are both 0.00%, so this is not a growing franchise. The company pays no dividend, so I am relying entirely on price appreciation in a cyclical sector. Promoter holding at 69.44% is positive — their interests are aligned with mine. ROCE of 13.45% is decent but not extraordinary. Graham would say: 'The investor's chief problem is himself.' I must avoid the temptation to label a cyclical as a compounder. Without more data — book value, debt levels, cash flow, and a longer earnings history — I cannot build a reliable valuation. This is a speculation, not an investment, until I see evidence of financial strength and a clear margin of safety. I would keep it on the watchlist but not commit capital without further proof.
Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer