Rollins, Inc. (ROL)
StalwartFairStock Score: 45/100 — MIXED
Key Financials
| Current Price | $53.42 |
| Market Cap | $27.1B |
| P/E Ratio | 49.01 |
| ROE | 38.67% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical |
Strengths
- Exceptional ROE of 38.94% and ROCE of 15.29% demonstrate sustainable competitive advantages and operational excellence
- Recurring revenue model with high customer switching costs provides earnings stability and predictable cash flows
- Strong free cash flow generation of $555.2M proves business quality and funds organic growth and shareholder returns
- Fortress balance sheet with Altman Z-Score of 9.87 and manageable D/E of 0.76 provides financial flexibility
- Defensive business characteristics with low beta of 0.80 during market volatility
Concerns
- Valuation is egregiously expensive at 48.86x P/E with Graham Number of $3.93—margin of safety virtually non-existent
- EV/EBITDA of 144.61x is indefensible for a mature, slow-growth services business with FCF yield of only 0.6%
- Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates deteriorating financial quality despite recent earnings strength
- FairStock Score of 40/100 and extremely negative margin of safety suggest significant downside risk
AI Analysis
Rollins presents a classic case of a quality business trading at an unreasonable price. Let me be direct: at 48.86x earnings with a Graham Number of just $3.93, this company is wildly overvalued by any fundamental measure. The margin of safety is essentially non-existent at -1332%, meaning you'd need the stock to fall dramatically just to approach fair value. That said, I must acknowledge what management has built. The pest control business is remarkably resilient—recurring revenue, high switching costs, and pricing power are genuine moats. ROE of 38.94% demonstrates exceptional capital efficiency, and free cash flow of $555.2M validates the earnings quality. The latest quarter shows 12.75% net margins, respectable for the industry. However, the valuation metrics are screaming warnings. An EV/EBITDA of 144.61x is absurd for a mature services business. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and FairStock score of 40/100 suggest deteriorating financial conditions despite recent profitability. While the Altman Z-Score of 9.87 indicates fortress-like balance sheet strength, this cannot justify paying nearly 49x earnings. The low beta of 0.80 appeals to defensive investors, but quality alone doesn't justify such premium valuations. This is a business I'd love to own at $15-20 per share, not $56. At current prices, I'm sitting on the sidelines.
Bull Case
Rollins' recurring revenue model and pricing power in essential pest control services provide durability through economic cycles. With 21,946 employees and expanding commercial contracts, the company demonstrates sustainable competitive advantages that justify premium valuations for quality-focused investors seeking defensive exposure.
Bear Case
At 48.86x earnings with a Graham Number of $3.93, Rollins is priced for perfection with no margin of safety. The 144.61x EV/EBITDA multiple is unjustifiable for a mature business with 0.6% FCF yield, leaving investors exposed to significant valuation compression.
Data from SEC filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer