Rapid Fleet (RAPIDFLEET)

Cyclical

Score breakdown: P/E: 2/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 0/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹171
Market Cap₹136.06 Cr
P/E Ratio18.41
ROCE24.8%
ROE—%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth-41.23%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-11.71%
Promoter Holding67.54%
52-Week Range₹158 — ₹241.9
SectorTransport Services

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

This business reminds me of a cyclical operator that looks cheap only if you ignore the rearview mirror. Rapid Fleet earns a ROCE of 24.80%, which is respectable, and promoters own 67.54%, so alignment of interest exists. But the income statement is flashing red: sales fell 11.71% and profit dropped 41.23% over the latest period. The latest quarter did generate ₹75 crore in sales and ₹4 crore in net profit, so the engine is still running, but with weaker fuel. At ₹171, the market cap is ₹136 crore and the P/E is 18.41. That is not a bargain price for a business whose earnings are contracting. Graham would ask for a margin of safety, and this multiple offers little. The Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 is a serious red flag; it tells me overall financial health has deteriorated, and I cannot ignore that just because ROCE looks good. There is no dividend, so shareholders depend entirely on capital appreciation. With negative growth, that appreciation is not assured. Logistics is a competitive, low-moat industry; customers can shift orders easily. This looks more like a cyclical downswing or a business-specific setback. I would need proof of stabilizing sales and profit before considering the shares. Without book value or debt data, I cannot judge the balance sheet properly. The company is not a great growth story; it may become a value trap if operational deterioration continues. I would watch quarterly numbers and cash flows carefully. The price is near the 52-week low, but a low price alone is not value. I need evidence that the business will grow, or at least stop shrinking.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer