Rajvir Inds. (RAJVIR)

Turnaround

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 0/2 · Growth: 1/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹5.64
Market Cap₹2.77 Cr
P/E Ratio0
ROCE0%
ROE33.86%
Dividend Yield0%
Profit Growth2.28%
Debt/Equity
Sales Growth-15.95%
Promoter Holding74.94%
52-Week Range₹5.64 — ₹10.5
SectorTextiles & Apparels
Book Value₹-281.62

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

At ₹7.65, Rajvir Inds. has a market cap of only ₹3 crore. That alone makes it a microcap, but size is not my main worry. The balance sheet is. Book value is negative at ₹-281.62 per share. In Graham's language, the equity cushion has vanished; creditors and preference holders stand ahead of equity, and shareholders own little more than hope. The reported ROE of 33.86% is an arithmetic illusion from dividing by negative equity. ROCE is 0.00%. Latest quarter sales were ₹6 crore, yet the company lost ₹9 crore. A business that loses one and a half times its quarterly revenue is burning capital at an alarming pace. Sales declined 15.91%, and profit growth of 2.29% is meaningless because the base is loss-making. P/E of 0.00 is an accounting artifact, not a cheap multiple. No dividend is being paid. Textile products is a fiercely competitive, low-moat industry with little pricing power. Promoter holding is high at 74.94%, which can align interests, but with a ₹3 crore market cap it also means poor liquidity and a low float. Piotroski F-score of 5/9 is middling, but any score with negative equity deserves deep suspicion. The 52-week range is ₹5.64 to ₹10.50, but a falling knife has no true price. This is not a business I can value with any margin of safety. It could be a turnaround opportunity if management brings in fresh equity, restructures debt, and stabilises operations. But the evidence today points to a distressed, cash-consuming textile company. Graham taught us to buy safe, understandable businesses with positive tangible assets. Rajvir fails that test. For me, this is a pass.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer