Privi Speci. (PRIVISCL)

Fast Grower

FairStock Score: 48/100 — MIXED

Score breakdown: P/E: 0/3 · ROCE: 1/2 · Growth: 2/2 · Dividend: 0/1

Key Financials

Current Price₹3,482.2
Market Cap₹13,602.41 Cr
P/E Ratio40.16
ROCE16.42%
ROE32.37%
Dividend Yield0.29%
Profit Growth22.68%
Debt/Equity0.74
Sales Growth7.05%
Free Cash Flow₹-13 Cr
Promoter Holding60.6%
52-Week Range₹2,299.8 — ₹3,785.3
SectorChemicals & Petrochemicals
Book Value₹361.58

Strengths

Concerns

AI Analysis

Let me look at Privi Speci through Benjamin Graham's eyes. At ₹3,250.80, I am asked to pay 39.53 times earnings and 12.65 times book value. Book value is only ₹257.06. That is not a margin of safety. The business does have qualities: return on equity is 32.37%, and latest profit growth of 75.50% with sales growth of 23.18% shows momentum. But I must ask whether it is durable. ROCE is 16.42%, so much of the high ROE comes from leverage; debt to equity is 0.86, not alarming but hardly fortress-like. More concerning, free cash flow is negative at ₹-13 Cr. A company reporting ₹75 Cr quarterly net profit should not burn cash. This makes me question earnings quality. The five-year revenue CAGR is only 10.47%, far below the latest 23.18% sales rise. That gap tells me the current growth may be cyclical rather than structural. Specialty chemicals can be a good business, but at this price the market expects perfection. The PEG ratio of 0.80 is tempting, but it assumes today's high profit growth continues, and growth on a base of ₹11,874 Cr becomes harder. Promoter holding of 60.60% is a plus; Piotroski F-score of 7 also suggests a financially sound firm. Still, a dividend yield of 0.16% gives me little while I wait. I'd call it a fast grower, but not a bargain. For a value investor, the price must offer enough upside to compensate for the risk of a cyclical slowdown. I would wait for a lower price or clear evidence that cash generation catches up with reported earnings.

Data from BSE/NSE filings. AI analysis is for educational purposes only — not investment advice. Scoring methodology · Disclaimer